A federal court ruled that the existing process for challenging inclusion on the No Fly List violated due process. Thirteen American plaintiffs represented by the ACLU had been unable to obtain adequate reasons or meaningful redress. The ruling required reform of the challenge procedure. It did not declare the entire watchlisting system unconstitutional or automatically remove every listed person.
Log in om dit verhaal leuk te vinden of te bookmarken.
🔖 Bookmarken
Organisaties in dit Evenement
Nog geen afbeeldingen of video's voor deze gebeurtenis.
Gerelateerde evenementen
What did the Latif ruling address?
🎉😄
😢
Uitleg
The court found the existing redress process unconstitutional under due process requirements. It required meaningful procedural reform rather than abolishing the entire list.
Nog geen waar/niet waar-vragen voor dit verhaal.