A federal court ruled that the existing process for challenging inclusion on the No Fly List violated due process. Thirteen American plaintiffs represented by the ACLU had been unable to obtain adequate reasons or meaningful redress. The ruling required reform of the challenge procedure. It did not declare the entire watchlisting system unconstitutional or automatically remove every listed person.
Log in to like or bookmark this story.
🔖 Bookmark
Organizations in this Event
No images or videos for this event yet.
Related Events
What did the Latif ruling address?
🎉😄
😢
Explanation
The court found the existing redress process unconstitutional under due process requirements. It required meaningful procedural reform rather than abolishing the entire list.
No true or false questions for this story yet.