Dozens of organizations and individuals filed supporting briefs in the Hassan surveillance appeal. Participants included civil rights groups, faith organizations and descendants of Japanese Americans interned during the Second World War. Their arguments connected anti-Muslim profiling to earlier discriminatory state practices and challenged the idea that invoking security should prevent judicial scrutiny. The briefs supported litigation; they were not themselves a court ruling.
Log in to like or bookmark this story.
🔖 Bookmark
People in this event
Organizations in this Event
No images or videos for this event yet.
Related Events
Why were the supporting briefs in the Hassan appeal significant?
🎉😄
😢
Explanation
Amicus briefs brought diverse allies into the legal struggle. Some drew lessons from Japanese American internment to challenge uncritical acceptance of security justifications.
No true or false questions for this story yet.