The Assembly directed an open-ended ministerial committee to develop a comprehensive strategy, including the option of collective withdrawal. The decision cited concerns about immunity, Security Council referrals and perceived unequal treatment; it recorded political disagreement, not a completed or unanimous exit from the Statute.
Log in om dit verhaal leuk te vinden of te bookmarken.
🔖 Bookmarken
Personen in deze gebeurtenis
Nu in het nieuws
Nog geen afbeeldingen of video's voor deze gebeurtenis.
Gerelateerde evenementen
What did the AU’s 2016 decision on withdrawal represent?
🎉😄
😢
Uitleg
The decision initiated strategy work and reflected disagreement; it did not itself withdraw states from the Statute.
The AU’s 2016 decision itself withdrew every AU member from the ICC.
🎉😄
😢
Uitleg
It ordered development of a strategy; it did not cause collective withdrawal.