The Assembly directed an open-ended ministerial committee to develop a comprehensive strategy, including the option of collective withdrawal. The decision cited concerns about immunity, Security Council referrals and perceived unequal treatment; it recorded political disagreement, not a completed or unanimous exit from the Statute.
Inisiá sesion pa gusta òf marká e relato aki.
🔖 Marká
Personanan den e suseso aki
Awor den notisia
Ainda no tin imágen ni vidio pa e suseso aki.
Eventonan Relashoná
What did the AU’s 2016 decision on withdrawal represent?
🎉😄
😢
Splikashon
The decision initiated strategy work and reflected disagreement; it did not itself withdraw states from the Statute.
The AU’s 2016 decision itself withdrew every AU member from the ICC.
🎉😄
😢
Splikashon
It ordered development of a strategy; it did not cause collective withdrawal.