The Assembly directed an open-ended ministerial committee to develop a comprehensive strategy, including the option of collective withdrawal. The decision cited concerns about immunity, Security Council referrals and perceived unequal treatment; it recorded political disagreement, not a completed or unanimous exit from the Statute.
Log in to like or bookmark this story.
🔖 Bookmark
People in this event
In the news now
No images or videos for this event yet.
Related Events
What did the AU’s 2016 decision on withdrawal represent?
🎉😄
😢
Explanation
The decision initiated strategy work and reflected disagreement; it did not itself withdraw states from the Statute.
The AU’s 2016 decision itself withdrew every AU member from the ICC.
🎉😄
😢
Explanation
It ordered development of a strategy; it did not cause collective withdrawal.