The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights sought to intervene as a third party in the Supreme Court litigation over India’s Citizenship Amendment Act. The application raised questions about equality and international protections for migrants, including refugees. India objected to outside intervention. The step supported scrutiny of the law’s exclusion of Muslims; it was not a Supreme Court ruling invalidating the Act.
Log in om dit verhaal leuk te vinden of te bookmarken.
🔖 Bookmarken
Personen in deze gebeurtenis
Organisaties in dit Evenement
Nog geen afbeeldingen of video's voor deze gebeurtenis.
Gerelateerde evenementen
Nog geen quizvragen voor dit verhaal.
The UN human-rights office’s intervention request itself invalidated India’s Citizenship Amendment Act.
🎉😄
😢
Uitleg
The office sought third-party intervention in litigation; that was not a court ruling striking down the Act.