The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Crown has a duty to consult and, where appropriate, accommodate Indigenous peoples when contemplated conduct may adversely affect potential rights. The Haida challenge arose from forestry decisions. The ruling limited unilateral state action while distinguishing consultation from an unconditional veto over every decision.
Log in om dit verhaal leuk te vinden of te bookmarken.
🔖 Bookmarken
Personen in deze gebeurtenis
Nog geen afbeeldingen of video's voor deze gebeurtenis.
Gerelateerde evenementen
What principle did Haida Nation establish concerning potential Indigenous rights?
🎉😄
😢
Uitleg
The duty can arise when the Crown knows of potential rights and contemplates conduct that could adversely affect them.
Nog geen waar/niet waar-vragen voor dit verhaal.