The Supreme Court of Canada held that the Crown has a duty to consult and, where appropriate, accommodate Indigenous peoples when contemplated conduct may adversely affect potential rights. The Haida challenge arose from forestry decisions. The ruling limited unilateral state action while distinguishing consultation from an unconditional veto over every decision.
Log in to like or bookmark this story.
🔖 Bookmark
People in this event
No images or videos for this event yet.
Related Events
What principle did Haida Nation establish concerning potential Indigenous rights?
🎉😄
😢
Explanation
The duty can arise when the Crown knows of potential rights and contemplates conduct that could adversely affect them.
No true or false questions for this story yet.