A Jamaican act manumitted Jack, an enslaved man owned by planter Peter Thomas, citing his role in revealing conspiracies and suppressing the recent uprising. The Assembly also ordered an annual payment to him. The document exposes the coercive logic of the slave regime: a person was legally treated as property, and the state could selectively grant freedom as a reward for service to colonial power. Jack's individual manumission did not challenge slavery for the rest of the island's enslaved population.
Log in to like or bookmark this story.
๐ Bookmark
No images or videos for this event yet.
Related Events
What did the 1761 act freeing Jack reveal about manumission?
๐๐
๐ข
Explanation
Jack's individual manumission rewarded service to colonial authorities; it did not end slavery for others.
Jack's manumission in 1761 freed all enslaved people in Jamaica.
๐๐
๐ข
Explanation
The act freed Jack individually as a reward; the broader slave system continued.