The parliamentary record shows debate about the conditions attached to children’s nominal freedom. The final proposal would leave owners with a choice to receive compensation or use a child’s labor until age 21. The state’s claim to humanitarian reform coexisted with a long extension of compulsory service.
Log in to like or bookmark this story.
🔖 Bookmark
Organizations in this Event
No images or videos for this event yet.
Related Events
Why were children’s service obligations significant to family life?
🎉😄
😢
Explanation
Owners and guardians could control children’s work and residence despite nominal free status.
A decolonial account should treat enslaved mothers as passive recipients of reforms.
🎉😄
😢
Explanation
Their savings, negotiations, court actions, and other strategies were forms of agency.