Selman Reis dates a strategic report on Yemen and Red Sea routes

On 10 Sha’ban 931 AH, converted by TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi as 2 June 1525, Selman Reis submitted a report to Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha. It discussed the India sea route, coastal security, Portuguese-held forts, and Yemen’s strategic ports. The document shows how Ottoman-Mamluk naval planning treated Yemen as a corridor and military resource; it does not establish that local communities consented to imperial control.

On 10 Sha’ban 931 AH, converted by TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi as 2 June 1525, Selman Reis submitted a report to Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha. It discussed the India sea route, coastal security, Portuguese-held forts, and Yemen’s strategic ports. The document shows how Ottoman-Mamluk naval planning treated Yemen as a corridor and military resource; it does not establish that local communities consented to imperial control.

On 10 Sha’ban 931 AH, converted by TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi as 2 June 1525, Selman Reis submitted a report to Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha. It discussed the India sea route, coastal security, Portuguese-held forts, and Yemen’s strategic ports. The document shows how Ottoman-Mamluk naval planning treated Yemen as a corridor and military resource; it does not establish that local communities consented to imperial control.

False. Its documented date is 02 06 1525. On 10 Sha’ban 931 AH, converted by TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi as 2 June 1525, Selman Reis submitted a report to Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha. It discussed the India sea route, coastal security, Portuguese-held forts, and Yemen’s strategic ports. The document shows how Ottoman-Mamluk naval planning treated Yemen as a corridor and military resource; it does not establish that local communities consented to imperial control.

On 10 Sha’ban 931 AH, converted by TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi as 2 June 1525, Selman Reis submitted a report to Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha. It discussed the India sea route, coastal security, Portuguese-held forts, and Yemen’s strategic ports. The document shows how Ottoman-Mamluk naval planning treated Yemen as a corridor and military resource; it does not establish that local communities consented to imperial control.

False. The evidence describes a coastal intervention and continuing Zaydi and local authority. On 10 Sha’ban 931 AH, converted by TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi as 2 June 1525, Selman Reis submitted a report to Grand Vizier Ibrahim Pasha. It discussed the India sea route, coastal security, Portuguese-held forts, and Yemen’s strategic ports. The document shows how Ottoman-Mamluk naval planning treated Yemen as a corridor and military resource; it does not establish that local communities consented to imperial control.