Organizations/movement: Arab Higher Committee delegation. Action: Cattan addressed the UN General Assembly’s First Committee and challenged the legitimacy of policies imposed without Palestinian consent. Result: The Palestinian case was placed before the committee discussing the inquiry into Palestine. Impact / interpretation: He explicitly distinguished opposition to imposed colonization from prejudice against Jews. His speech is a primary statement of advocacy, not a UN ruling accepting all his legal claims.
Log in om dit verhaal leuk te vinden of te bookmarken.
🔖 Bookmarken
Personen in deze gebeurtenis
Organisaties in dit Evenement
Nu in het nieuws
Living Hands: Heritage and Design in Dialogue
📅 13 November 2026
Be Our Voices: Exhibition in Support of the Palestinian People
📅 13 November 2026
Wadeei Khaled: Nearness
📅 12 November 2026
we walk in our sleep المُتَجاوِزُون (Noor Abed film installation)
📅 12 November 2026
Hamas condemns settler assault on olive harvest volunteers near Qusra
📅 11 November 2026
Nog geen afbeeldingen of video's voor deze gebeurtenis.
Gerelateerde evenementen
What distinction did Henry Cattan emphasize in his 1947 UN speech?
🎉😄
😢
Uitleg
Cattan framed the claim in terms of consent and self-determination.
Nog geen waar/niet waar-vragen voor dit verhaal.