Brazil's Supreme Federal Court rejected the marco temporal argument restricting Indigenous land recognition by reference to occupation on the date of the 1988 Constitution. Indigenous mobilization contested a rule that could disregard earlier forced displacement. The ruling defended original territorial rights, while subsequent legislative conflict meant the wider struggle continued.
Log in om dit verhaal leuk te vinden of te bookmarken.
🔖 Bookmarken
Nog geen afbeeldingen of video's voor deze gebeurtenis.
Gerelateerde evenementen
What problem did Indigenous opponents identify in the marco temporal argument?
🎉😄
😢
Uitleg
A fixed occupation cutoff can disadvantage communities previously forced off their land. The ruling rejected this restrictive approach.
Nog geen waar/niet waar-vragen voor dit verhaal.